Visitors from outer space

15 February 2013: A small asteroid enters the Earth atmosphere over Russia. Mass ~11.000 tonnes, size ~20 m and speed ~18 km/s. At an altitude between 15-25 km it explodes, causing a shock wave on the ground resulting in about 1500 people hurt (mostly by scattered glass) and ~ 7000 buildings damaged. Estimated energy 440 kilotons of TNT,  equivalent to ~25  times the energy of the  atomic bomb on Hiroshima, most of it absorbed in the atmosphere. This asteroid had not been discovered before its impact.

On the same day  about 15 hours later, asteroid 2012 DA14 passes Earth at a distance of only 28.000 km (that is within the orbit of the telecommunication satellites!). Bigger (about 40.000 tonnes and 30 m), it was discovered in February 2012. Although occurring almost simultaneously, the two events are not related.

Next year, 19-10-2014,  comet C/2013 A1 will pass extremely close to Mars, with a small possibility of an impact with the planet. Here we are talking about a different order of magnitude! Estimated size of the comet nucleus is ~ 3km! IF it would hit Mars, the energy released would be in the order of millions of Megatons of TNT. For comparison, the asteroid that struck Earth 65 million years ago and ended the dinosaur era on Earth  was only about three times as powerful.

Asteroid hits Earth

Do we have to get worried? In the aftermath of the Chelyabinsk meteor there was a lot of commotion in the media that action should be taken immediately to protect us from future collisions. Suggesting that nobody had expected this. As if the scientific world was not already aware of this problem!

Those outer space objects (asteroids, meteorites, comets) that can come close to (or even hit) Earth are called Near Earth Objects (NEO’s). Because of the impact risk they are monitored already for decades. The problem is that there are many of them and that they come in all sizes. Here is a graph of their distribution. The blue line gives the number of known NEO’s, the red line is a estimate of their total number. Please note the double logarithmic scale of the graph! For example, only about 100 NEO’s with a size of ~10 meter have been observed, whereas the estimated total number is ~ 10 million!

Distribution of NEO's

At the moment about 10.000 Near-Earth objects have been discovered. About 900 of them are asteroids with a size of 1 km or larger.

Here is a table with (statistical) information about the impact of a NEO. The second row gives data for objects with a size of 30 meter. The 2012 DA14 falls in this category. The effect of impact: a fireball, a shock wave and minor damage. Fits quite well the Chelyabinsk meteor, although it was smaller. The second column gives the average time in years between impacts of this size: 300 year.

If comet C/2013 A1 would have been on a (near) collision course with Earth, it would fall in the category: Billions of people dead, global climate change. Time interval: millions of years.

Followers of my blog may remember the post about Apophis At the time of discovery there was worry that it might hit Earth. We know now that the probability of impact is negligible. With its estimated size of 300 m it would create havoc, but no global destruction.

Neo impact risk

If a NEO on collision course is discovered early enough, it may be possible to deflect it. Numerous proposals exist. See my post Paintballing Apophis or do a Google search on “deflecting a NEO

Conclusion: Earth runs a risk of an impact with a NEO. It is not a matter of IF but of WHEN. Early observation of “dangerous” NEO’s is important, so protecting measures can be taken. That is why there are global initiatives, like for example  NEOShield

Neoshield

For this post graphs, tables etc have been taken from this very informative site.

Largest structure in the Universe discovered

This will be a bit longish post…:-)

A few weeks ago an in international team of astronomers announced the discovery of the largest structure in the universe: a group of quasars extending over a distance of 4 billion lightyear (ly).

LQG

Quasars (Quasi-Stellar Radio Objects) were discovered about 50 years ago. They look like stars but are so distant (billions of ly away) that they can not be stars. Now we know that they are active nuclei of galaxies, surrounding a massive black hole in the center. Billions of ly away means that we observe them as they were billions of years ago  when the universe was still young.

More than 200.000 quasars are known at present. Some of them occur in (large) groups, called LQC‘s.The group that has now been discovered has 72 members (the black circles in the image). The red crosses form another, smaller group.

So, why is the discovery of this large group of quasars so exciting? To make that clear, we have to talk about the cosmological principle and the large-scale structure of the universe.

Long it has been thought that the Earth was the center of the Universe. Then it was discovered that Earth is one of several planets orbiting a star, the Sun. It is the blue marble in the image below. It is not in scale, light needs only 8 minutes to travel from the Sun to Earth, and more than four hours to reach the outermost planet Neptune.

The Solar System

Is the Sun the center of the Universe? No, the Sun is one of several hundreds of billions of stars in our galaxy, the Milky Way.  Some of you may have seen the Milky Way on a cloudless clear night far away from cities, as a white band of light across the sky. Here is an artist impression of the Milky Way as seen by an observer from outer space. The approximate location of our Sun has been indicated with a red cross. The diameter of the Milky Way is about 100.000 ly.

The Milky Way

Is then the Milky Way the center of the Universe? Again negative! Our Milky Way is just one of hundreds of billions of similar galaxies.  The scientists now think that the Universe has no center! From each location and in each direction the Universe looks the same, if you observe it on a sufficiently large scale. This is called the Cosmological Principle

So, what is a sufficiently large scale? If the galaxies would be randomly distributed in the Universe, we would not need to zoom out further. But that is not the case! Our Milky Way is a member of a group of more than 50 galaxies, bound by gravity. It is called the Local Group. Most of the galaxies in this Local Group are small ones, with the exception of our neighbour, the beautiful Andromeda galaxy.

Andromeda

Andromeda is bigger than the Milky Way, may contain one trillion stars and is located at a distance of 2.5 million light-years from our galaxy. Here is a “3-dimensional” sketch of the local group.

Local Group

The size of the Local Group is in the order of 10 million ly. Many more of these galaxy clusters exist, for example the Virgo Cluster, much bigger than our Local Group, consisting of more than 1000 galaxies, at a distance of 54 million ly.

Here is the Virgo Cluster. All the fuzzy blobs are galaxies, the light points are stars in our own Milky Way. Click on the image to enlarge it and take a few minutes to think about the meaning of life..:-)

Virgo-cluster

We still have to zoom further out. Our Local Group, the Virgo Cluster, the Fornax cluster, the Eridanus cluster and about 100 more are part of an even larger collection, the Virgo Supercluster . Here is one more “3-dimensional” sketch of this supercluster.

Virgo Supercluster

You will see the Local Group in the center, the Fornax and Eridanus clusters and many more. We are talking now about a size of more than 100 million ly already!

Many more superclusters have been discovered. Could it be that these superclusters of galaxies are randomly distributed in the Universe. Let’s zoom out one more time! The image below shows the superclusters around us within a distance of 1 billion ly. So the width of this image is 2000 million ly.

Superclusters

Obviously this is not a random distribution. Clusters and superclusters are aligned along filaments filaments, with in between large portions of space almost without any galaxies. It  looks like a kind of foam-like structure and is sometimes called the Cosmic Web. In the center you notice the Virgo supercluster. Keep in mind the zooming out steps we have made to reach here! Earth → Sol → Milky Way → Local Group → Virgo Cluster → Virgo Supercluster → Cosmic Web.

Do we need to zoom out more? According to the present cosmology theories: NO. Computer simulations starting from right after the Big Bang show that this foam-like structure on a scale of hundreds of millions of light-years is to be expected. Starting point for these simulations is the measured Cosmic Background Radiation CMB), as depicted in the image below.CMB radiation

To explain the relation between this CMB image and the large-scale structure asks for another post…:-).  Basically the Standard model of Cosmology is used, including the effects of Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Here is a typical result of such a simulation. The image has a width of 1500 million ly  The bright nodes represent Superclusters. You will notice strings of galaxies and voids, quite comparable to the real Universe. At this scale, the Universe looks basically everywhere the same.

Cosmic Web

We started this post with the discovery of a group of quasars extending about 4000 million ly. Quasars are nuclei of galaxies, so in the terminology used above, they would form a “cluster”. But a cluster of this size would not fit in the above image at all!

This explains the excitement among astronomers and cosmologists. Is the Standard Model of Cosmology wrong?

Let’s wait and see!

Several images in this post come from a fascinating website: An Atlas of the Universe

Doomsday 2012 and the Sun

The Mayan Long Count calendar ended on 21-12-2012. Actually it did not really end, but a new cycle started on that date. So 21-12-2012 can be seen as Mayan New Year’s Eve. The next one will be on 26-3-2407.

Quite a few people expected that the world would end on this day. Sad. Suddenly Nibiru would show up behind the moon and destroy Earth, or the magnetic field of Earth would suddenly reverse, etc.

Here is a picture of the Sun, apparently taken just after “Doomsday”. It looks like the Sun is winking…:-). The picture comes from a recent newspaper article, personally I doubt if the picture is authentic, especially the “lips” I find suspicious.

Doomsday Sun

In the past I have published several posts about the Sun. It will reach a maximum in its 11-year sunspot cycle, next year. It is becoming clear now that this maximum will be very low. Here is a picture updated until December 2012.

ssn_predict_l

The expected maximum of around 72 will be the lowest since 1906. Nevertheless Michio Kaku , the physicist “who would kill his mother to get publicity” (quote by me, LOL) is warning about solar storms that might create havoc on earth.

Paintballing Apophis!

Before I started blogging, I wrote emails to a group of friends, interested in science. Several of these emails I have, after editing, entered as posts for my blog.
The first email (and now the first post on this blog) was about Apophis, an asteroid, that will pass Earth in 2029 at a close distance, and might (with a chance of 1 to 250.000) collide with Earth 7 years later, in 2036

This is an artist impression of Apophis, diameter ~ 270 m with an estimated mass of 27 megatonnes.

A collision with the earth would be a catastrophe. The impact would be the equivalent of 900 megaton TNT, ~ 60.000 Hiroshima atomic bombs.

 

When Apophis was discovered in 2004, there was a brief period of concern that this asteroid might hit Earth in 2029. It will not, and even in 2036 the chance is almost neglegible

But there are thousands of asteroids with orbits that may bring them close to Earth, so called NEA‘s, and NASA has an observation program to monitor them.

What to do when an asteroid is discovered which is on a crash course with Earth? We will have to deflect it! How? Many solutions have been proposed. Send a rocket to the asteroid and detonate a nuclear bomb, or let the rocket crash itself against the asteroid. Or use a strong laser beam to deflect the course.When you do this while the asteroid is still far away, a tiny change in course could be sufficient.

For a couple of years already a yearly competition “Move an Asteroid” is organised by the Space Generation Advisory Council , for students and young (space) professionals.

This year the competition was won by a MIT graduate student, Sung Wook Paek.

His winning proposal:

Launch a rocket, with a cargo of 5000 kg of pellets, filled with white paint. When near the asteroid, fire two salvos of pellets, timed in such a way, that the (spinning) asteroid will be completely covered with a very thin layer of white paint.

Here are two screenshots of a YouTube clip, published by MIT. In the left picture two pellet clouds are approaching the asteroid.  In the right picture one cloud has painted one half of the asteroid white already.

The colliding pellets will change the course of the asteroid a little bit. That is not new, but the white paint is. The photons from the sun will reflect against this bright white surface, and this results in (additional) radiation pressure. Also a tiny effect, so this kind of action should be taken, many years before the asteroid comes close to the earth.

Cosmic paintball, what a nice idea!

How is the Sun doing these days?

My last post about the Sun is from August 2010. At that time it had become clear already that the present Solar Cycle 24 would be a weak one. We are now two years further, the maximum in solar activity is expected around September next year. Time for an update.

Here is the most recent prediction, with data points until September

The current prediction is a (smoothed) sunspot number maximum of about 76. That is low! We have to go back to Cycle 14 in 1906, to find a lower maximum value of 64.

Here is a graph of the Solar Cycles over the past four centuries. With red crosses I have marked the 1906 maximum and the (predicted) 2013 maximum.

You will notice that the last half century we have had a “wave” of solar activity. Is that coming to an end now and will we enter a period of low solar activity? Nobody knows, as we do not understand very well the origin of the Solar Cycle.

Both the Maunder minimum (17th century) and the Dalton minimum (~ 1800) had influence on the Earth climate. Severe winters in Europe as can be seen in paintings of the Dutch School, like this famous one by Hendrick Avercamp (1585-1634)

Now we live in a period of global warming. There are strong indications that our carbon emission is at least partly responsible for this. But could there also be a contribution due to the high solar activity during the last fifty years? Those are sensitive questions..:-)

The discovery of extra-solar planet Kepler 22b

It is quite a long time ago that I have reported to you about interesting science topics!
Much of this year has been quiet, but that might change. So expect a few posts..:-)

1. Probably you have heard about neutrino’s traveling faster than light? That would be a really shocking discovery, if true….
For the time being, personally I bet it is not true. I may write about it later
2. There are rumours going around that next week CERN, during a press conference, will announce evidence for the Higgs boson, a.k.a the God particle.
It might be lighter than expected.
3. The Nobel prize for physics has been awarded this year for a discovery, the importance of which can be explained easily to interested outsiders. I will write about it soon.

This postl is about the discovery of extra-solar planet Kepler 22b.

You may remember that I have written a post in September 2010, about another extra-solar planet, the Gliese 581 g  located in the habitable zone of its star.
By the way, when you follow the Wikipedia link, you will see that there is some doubt now if this planet  really exists.

In March  2009, a satellite has been launched with a mission to discover Earth-like planets orbiting other stars. It was named  , very appropriately,  the Kepler satellite

Here is the satellite, note the size of the humans

How to discover planets? The stars may be hundreds of light-years away. Planets will not be directly visible at that distance.
Here is the procedure followed by the Kepler mission:

1. When a star has a planet,  the orbit of this planet can be such that it passes between Earth and the star.
2. In that case, the amount of star light reaching the earth will be slightly reduced during passage of the planet.
3. Measure the light intensity of the star. If there are periodic (minuscule) dips, it could be because of a planet passing. This will give the period of the planet. How large the dip is, will tell us something about the size of the planet.
4. When you know the mass of the star, Kepler’s third law will give you the radius of the planetary orbit, so you can draw conclusions if the planet is in the habitable zone of its star.

An ambitious program, right?
In 2004, our own planet Venus passed between the Sun and Earth.
With a group of friends we have been watching the event. You must take precautions not to be blinded by the sunlight.
Here is what we managed to see. The black dot in the sun’s image is Venus.

The Kepler approach will be, to look at the intensity of the starlight and at the dip in this intensity during the passage of the planet.
Not easy. This is akin to sensing the drop in brightness of a car’s headlight when a fruitfly moves in front of it

Well, it works!!
Until now, more than two thousand of so-called Kepler Objects of Interest (KOI’s), have been found. Not all of those will be planets.
Here is a preliminary list of potential habitable planets, found until December 2011.

Now, do NOT be fooled by the “artist impressions” of these planets.The blueish, watery color of several candidates is not based on any factual information about the presence of water.
The Kepler data give information about the size of the planet and its location within the habitable zone. It’s amazing that this can be done, for a star that maybe at a distance of hundreds of lightyears, but that’s it, for the time being.

By the way, note that Gliese 581 d is still in the list (outer edge of the habitable zone), but Gliese 581 g is no longer mentioned.

And also Kepler 22-b is not there, because that is the recent discovery, announced last week, that caused so much excitement.

Why the excitement? Here is a sketch

a) The star Kepler 22 is very similar to our Sun, in size and temperature
b) Kepler 22-b is within the habitable zone of the star
c) The planet is still larger than earth, but not much larger. So it could be a rocky planet. (Large planets, Jupiter size, will be gaseous) A rocky structure and liquid water are often seen as prerequisites for the development of life.

Again, the image of Kepler-22b in the above picture is an artist impression!
Keep that in mind when you read  reports like Human-like Life Could Exist on Newly-discovered Planet
With this quote: “A newly-discovered Earth-like planet could very well contain continental features where normal human-like life could exist. Or it  could be more of a water world with an ocean containing life forms similar to dolphins

Hm. Then I like this report better: Kepler 22b: probably not home to interesting aliens

Here are a few more links
The official website of the Kepler Mission ,well-designed, very interesting.
The website of the Planetary Habitability Laboratory

Do you want to help? Kepler is monitoring more than 150.000 stars, and is using computer software to look at recurring “dips” in the received starlight. A huge job. Humans are still better in pattern recognition. So why not become a planet hunter yourself?

The Great Debate: Are we alone? part 2

Two months ago I published The Great Debate: Are we alone? part 1

Here is finally part 2. My apologies for the long delay.

Quite a few of you gave their opinion about the question “Are we alone or not”.
Not surprisingly most ‘votes’ went to “We are not alone”, same as in the poll at the end of the Great Debate video.

My own opinion?
It will be wonderful and fascinating if (intelligent) life is found elsewhere in the universe, but personally I think we are alone.
Mind you, that is not arrogance, I would be more than happy if even primitive life is found elsewhere!

Let me explain why I have become (recently) more skeptical about life elsewhere in the universe.

In discussions about the probability of extraterrestrial life, you will often encounter the Drake equation.
In 1961 Frank Drake tried to make an educated guess about the number of intelligent civilisations in our own galaxy, the Milky Way.
He started with the (huge) number of stars in the Milky Way, then asked questions like: “how many stars will have planets”, “how many planets will be ‘habitable'”, “what is the chance that on such a planet (primitive) life will develop”, “what is the chance that intelligent life will evolve”, and several more of this kind of questions.
In his original estimate Drake comes to a number of about ten planets in our Galaxy at this moment, with intelligent, technologically advanced civilisations.

Many of the factors in the Drake equation are the result of guesswork.
For example, one of the points of discussion in the “Great Debate” is about the chance that intelligent life will evolve from primitive life. Drake’s estimate was 1 %. Marcy in the “Great Debate” thinks it might be close to zero. “Maybe we humans are just a freak evolutionary incident?

However, both Werthimer and Marcy agree: “primitive life will be teeming in the Universe.
Drake estimated the chance that life will develop on a habitable planet as 100%!
And Michio Kaku, an American ‘science communicator’, who always enjoys being in the limelight, goes even further: “The Laws of Probability Tell Us That the Universe Should Be Teeming With Intelligent Life Forms” Elsewhere he  writes (foolishly, IMHO) about a 100% probability!

Well, if they are right, why has until now no evidence of life been found on Mars?

A few days after my first “Are we Alone” mail, I sent you a short email about the exciting discovery of a habitable planet, orbiting Gliese 581, a red dwarf star at a distance of 20 lightyear from the sun.
Here is the picture again. Planet g is causing the excitement. The blue band is the habitable zone.

The concept of a habitable zone is based on the assumption that you need liquid water for the development of life. The (surface) temperature of a planet should not be too low or too high.  For a (cool) red star like Gliese 581, this zone lies much closer to the star, than for a hotter star like our Sun.
Of course you can think about more exotic  forms of life, based on silicon, ammonia, etc. Click here for a detailed discussion.

Now, when you look at the picture above, you will notice that both Earth and Mars are orbiting in the habitable zone of the Sun.
The Viking and Phoenix missions to the Red Planet had as one of their main targets the search for life on Mars, and I am sure that many scientists were hoping, or even convinced that evidence of life would be found. So was I.
But “nothing” has been found yet. Of course more exploration is needed and quite a few new missions have been planned.
Still it is disappointing and personally I believe now that the chance that life will develop on a habitable planet, might be small, maybe even very small.
Sure, the Miller-Urey experiments have shown that it is “easy” to synthesize amino acids, the building blocks of life, when the conditions are right.
And organic compounds have been found even in interstellar clouds.

But the next step is huge. Life is characterised by two fundamental properties, replication and metabolism.
We know that this step has been made at least once, on Earth.
Even on Earth there is no evidence that this step has been made more than once! Click here for more information about what is called abiogenesis.

So, this is my position:
As soon as evidence of life will be found, on Mars or deep under the frozen oceans of Jupiter’s moon Europa , I will celebrate and be convinced that life indeed is teeming in the Universe.
Until then, I believe in the Rare Earth Hypothesis , that we might well be alone.

New extrasolar planet has been discovered

Just two days after I had published my first post about life in the Universe, it was announced by two American astronomers, Vogt and Butler, that a new extrasolar planet has been discovered, the first one where life might be possible. See for example this New York Times article:

Reason for me to send publish an extra post, before I compose part two of the Great Debate post..

Gliese 581 is a so-called red dwarf star, located at a distance of 20 light-year from the Sun.
In itself a smallish nondescript star in our Milky Way, but interesting because it has been found that a number of planets orbit this star.
Four were known already, two more have been discovered now.
I have roughly given their position, size is not to scale. (keep in mind that the distance scale is logarithmic)

For comparison the Sun and some of its planets are also shown.
The blue band is the habitable zone, not too cold, not too hot, assuming water-based life.
Excitement is about planet g, right in the middle of Gliese’s habitable zone. This is a first. It has a mass of about 3 earth masses, and orbits Gliese in 37 days.

Only a pity, that the planet, like its 5 siblings, is tidally locked to Gliese, meaning that it always faces the same side to its sun (same as our moon is tidally locked to Earth). So it has a cold side and a hot side. If life exists there, it would probably be in the twilight zone

How is our sun doing these days? An update

End of March I have added a post about the (lack of) sunspot activity on the Sun.
Solar cycle 24 was so slow in starting, that some scientist got worried.
What is the present situation? See the graph below. Four more data points became available (April-July). The graph comes from http://solarcycle24.com/sunspots.htm
The red curve is a prediction, made in 2009.
The authors write:
If our prediction is correct, Solar Cycle 24 will have a peak sunspot number of 90, the lowest of any cycle since 1928 when Solar Cycle 16 peaked at 78

When you look at the latest data points, the prediction seems too high, it should be adjusted.
Actually this has been done last month, see below. This new prediction gives an even lower maximum, below 70 !!

If this prediction comes true, we even have to go back to solar cycle 14, with a peak value of  64, in 1906. Click here for the list of solar cycles.
You can bet on it that solar scientists are following the development with great interest.
I will give you another update in a couple of months.

Don’t worry, our sun is not dead!

As you know, the sun is our life source..:-)
Already for more that 4.5 billion years she (or is it he?) is providing the energy for our solar system and she will continue to do so for another 5 billion years, before she will “die” and end as a so-called white dwarf
So why did the well-known Dutch solar astronomer Kees de Jager remark in an interview, November 2009, that the sun was dead?

Well, he was talking about the sunspot activity of the sun. Or rather, the lack of sunspot activity!

Here is an image of the sun, with a number of sunspots

Sunspots are a result of magnetic activity on the sun. The number of sunspots fluctuates in time with a period of roughly 11 years.
See the graph below. It is clear that it is a periodic phenomenon, but also that it is quite irregular.
The cycles are numbered from the time accurate observations became available, around 1750.
Cycle 23 started in 1996, reached its maximum around 2002, ending in 2007.
At about that time, 2007-2008 the new cycle 24 was expected to start.

But it did NOT!

During 2008 and 2009 the sun was surprisingly quiet, with long periods without any sunspots at all.
Therefore astronomers all over the world were watching the sun with more than usual interest.
A special website http://solarcycle24.com/ is monitoring daily the behaviour of the sun.

Here is a detailed graph, updated until February 2010. The red curve is the expected one.

As you see, 2008 and 2009 have been very quiet, with the average sunspot number almost approaching zero.
BUT, starting from December 2009 it looks like we have the beginning of cycle 24! Finally.
In a couple of days the results for March will be published. You can check for yourself:  http://solarcycle24.com/sunspots.htm

Is this topic only of academic interest?
No.
There may be a relation between the solar activity and the temperature of Earth.

Here is one more graph of the solar sunspot activity, this time over a time period of 400 years. In 1610 sunspots were observed for the first time with the newly invented telescope.
The red crosses represent these early observations. They are less accurate, but nevertheless it is obvious that in the second half of the 17th century there were hardly any sunspots at all.
This dip in solar activity is called the Maunder Minimum.

 

In the same period Europe and North America (and probably the rest of the world) were subjected to very cold winters, this period is called the Little Ice Age
There is an ongoing debate if there is a causal connection.
The last 50 years there has been a maximum in sunspot activity. Could it be that this increased activity has been another factor in the global warming, besides carbon emission?