The discovery of extra-solar planet Kepler 22b

It is quite a long time ago that I have reported to you about interesting science topics!
Much of this year has been quiet, but that might change. So expect a few posts..:-)

1. Probably you have heard about neutrino’s traveling faster than light? That would be a really shocking discovery, if true….
For the time being, personally I bet it is not true. I may write about it later
2. There are rumours going around that next week CERN, during a press conference, will announce evidence for the Higgs boson, a.k.a the God particle.
It might be lighter than expected.
3. The Nobel prize for physics has been awarded this year for a discovery, the importance of which can be explained easily to interested outsiders. I will write about it soon.

This postl is about the discovery of extra-solar planet Kepler 22b.

You may remember that I have written a post in September 2010, about another extra-solar planet, the Gliese 581 g  located in the habitable zone of its star.
By the way, when you follow the Wikipedia link, you will see that there is some doubt now if this planet  really exists.

In March  2009, a satellite has been launched with a mission to discover Earth-like planets orbiting other stars. It was named  , very appropriately,  the Kepler satellite

Here is the satellite, note the size of the humans

How to discover planets? The stars may be hundreds of light-years away. Planets will not be directly visible at that distance.
Here is the procedure followed by the Kepler mission:

1. When a star has a planet,  the orbit of this planet can be such that it passes between Earth and the star.
2. In that case, the amount of star light reaching the earth will be slightly reduced during passage of the planet.
3. Measure the light intensity of the star. If there are periodic (minuscule) dips, it could be because of a planet passing. This will give the period of the planet. How large the dip is, will tell us something about the size of the planet.
4. When you know the mass of the star, Kepler’s third law will give you the radius of the planetary orbit, so you can draw conclusions if the planet is in the habitable zone of its star.

An ambitious program, right?
In 2004, our own planet Venus passed between the Sun and Earth.
With a group of friends we have been watching the event. You must take precautions not to be blinded by the sunlight.
Here is what we managed to see. The black dot in the sun’s image is Venus.

The Kepler approach will be, to look at the intensity of the starlight and at the dip in this intensity during the passage of the planet.
Not easy. This is akin to sensing the drop in brightness of a car’s headlight when a fruitfly moves in front of it

Well, it works!!
Until now, more than two thousand of so-called Kepler Objects of Interest (KOI’s), have been found. Not all of those will be planets.
Here is a preliminary list of potential habitable planets, found until December 2011.

Now, do NOT be fooled by the “artist impressions” of these planets.The blueish, watery color of several candidates is not based on any factual information about the presence of water.
The Kepler data give information about the size of the planet and its location within the habitable zone. It’s amazing that this can be done, for a star that maybe at a distance of hundreds of lightyears, but that’s it, for the time being.

By the way, note that Gliese 581 d is still in the list (outer edge of the habitable zone), but Gliese 581 g is no longer mentioned.

And also Kepler 22-b is not there, because that is the recent discovery, announced last week, that caused so much excitement.

Why the excitement? Here is a sketch

a) The star Kepler 22 is very similar to our Sun, in size and temperature
b) Kepler 22-b is within the habitable zone of the star
c) The planet is still larger than earth, but not much larger. So it could be a rocky planet. (Large planets, Jupiter size, will be gaseous) A rocky structure and liquid water are often seen as prerequisites for the development of life.

Again, the image of Kepler-22b in the above picture is an artist impression!
Keep that in mind when you read  reports like Human-like Life Could Exist on Newly-discovered Planet
With this quote: “A newly-discovered Earth-like planet could very well contain continental features where normal human-like life could exist. Or it  could be more of a water world with an ocean containing life forms similar to dolphins

Hm. Then I like this report better: Kepler 22b: probably not home to interesting aliens

Here are a few more links
The official website of the Kepler Mission ,well-designed, very interesting.
The website of the Planetary Habitability Laboratory

Do you want to help? Kepler is monitoring more than 150.000 stars, and is using computer software to look at recurring “dips” in the received starlight. A huge job. Humans are still better in pattern recognition. So why not become a planet hunter yourself?

The Great Debate: Are we alone? part 2

Two months ago I published The Great Debate: Are we alone? part 1

Here is finally part 2. My apologies for the long delay.

Quite a few of you gave their opinion about the question “Are we alone or not”.
Not surprisingly most ‘votes’ went to “We are not alone”, same as in the poll at the end of the Great Debate video.

My own opinion?
It will be wonderful and fascinating if (intelligent) life is found elsewhere in the universe, but personally I think we are alone.
Mind you, that is not arrogance, I would be more than happy if even primitive life is found elsewhere!

Let me explain why I have become (recently) more skeptical about life elsewhere in the universe.

In discussions about the probability of extraterrestrial life, you will often encounter the Drake equation.
In 1961 Frank Drake tried to make an educated guess about the number of intelligent civilisations in our own galaxy, the Milky Way.
He started with the (huge) number of stars in the Milky Way, then asked questions like: “how many stars will have planets”, “how many planets will be ‘habitable'”, “what is the chance that on such a planet (primitive) life will develop”, “what is the chance that intelligent life will evolve”, and several more of this kind of questions.
In his original estimate Drake comes to a number of about ten planets in our Galaxy at this moment, with intelligent, technologically advanced civilisations.

Many of the factors in the Drake equation are the result of guesswork.
For example, one of the points of discussion in the “Great Debate” is about the chance that intelligent life will evolve from primitive life. Drake’s estimate was 1 %. Marcy in the “Great Debate” thinks it might be close to zero. “Maybe we humans are just a freak evolutionary incident?

However, both Werthimer and Marcy agree: “primitive life will be teeming in the Universe.
Drake estimated the chance that life will develop on a habitable planet as 100%!
And Michio Kaku, an American ‘science communicator’, who always enjoys being in the limelight, goes even further: “The Laws of Probability Tell Us That the Universe Should Be Teeming With Intelligent Life Forms” Elsewhere he  writes (foolishly, IMHO) about a 100% probability!

Well, if they are right, why has until now no evidence of life been found on Mars?

A few days after my first “Are we Alone” mail, I sent you a short email about the exciting discovery of a habitable planet, orbiting Gliese 581, a red dwarf star at a distance of 20 lightyear from the sun.
Here is the picture again. Planet g is causing the excitement. The blue band is the habitable zone.

The concept of a habitable zone is based on the assumption that you need liquid water for the development of life. The (surface) temperature of a planet should not be too low or too high.  For a (cool) red star like Gliese 581, this zone lies much closer to the star, than for a hotter star like our Sun.
Of course you can think about more exotic  forms of life, based on silicon, ammonia, etc. Click here for a detailed discussion.

Now, when you look at the picture above, you will notice that both Earth and Mars are orbiting in the habitable zone of the Sun.
The Viking and Phoenix missions to the Red Planet had as one of their main targets the search for life on Mars, and I am sure that many scientists were hoping, or even convinced that evidence of life would be found. So was I.
But “nothing” has been found yet. Of course more exploration is needed and quite a few new missions have been planned.
Still it is disappointing and personally I believe now that the chance that life will develop on a habitable planet, might be small, maybe even very small.
Sure, the Miller-Urey experiments have shown that it is “easy” to synthesize amino acids, the building blocks of life, when the conditions are right.
And organic compounds have been found even in interstellar clouds.

But the next step is huge. Life is characterised by two fundamental properties, replication and metabolism.
We know that this step has been made at least once, on Earth.
Even on Earth there is no evidence that this step has been made more than once! Click here for more information about what is called abiogenesis.

So, this is my position:
As soon as evidence of life will be found, on Mars or deep under the frozen oceans of Jupiter’s moon Europa , I will celebrate and be convinced that life indeed is teeming in the Universe.
Until then, I believe in the Rare Earth Hypothesis , that we might well be alone.

New extrasolar planet has been discovered

Just two days after I had published my first post about life in the Universe, it was announced by two American astronomers, Vogt and Butler, that a new extrasolar planet has been discovered, the first one where life might be possible. See for example this New York Times article:

Reason for me to send publish an extra post, before I compose part two of the Great Debate post..

Gliese 581 is a so-called red dwarf star, located at a distance of 20 light-year from the Sun.
In itself a smallish nondescript star in our Milky Way, but interesting because it has been found that a number of planets orbit this star.
Four were known already, two more have been discovered now.
I have roughly given their position, size is not to scale. (keep in mind that the distance scale is logarithmic)

For comparison the Sun and some of its planets are also shown.
The blue band is the habitable zone, not too cold, not too hot, assuming water-based life.
Excitement is about planet g, right in the middle of Gliese’s habitable zone. This is a first. It has a mass of about 3 earth masses, and orbits Gliese in 37 days.

Only a pity, that the planet, like its 5 siblings, is tidally locked to Gliese, meaning that it always faces the same side to its sun (same as our moon is tidally locked to Earth). So it has a cold side and a hot side. If life exists there, it would probably be in the twilight zone

How is our sun doing these days? An update

End of March I have added a post about the (lack of) sunspot activity on the Sun.
Solar cycle 24 was so slow in starting, that some scientist got worried.
What is the present situation? See the graph below. Four more data points became available (April-July). The graph comes from http://solarcycle24.com/sunspots.htm
The red curve is a prediction, made in 2009.
The authors write:
If our prediction is correct, Solar Cycle 24 will have a peak sunspot number of 90, the lowest of any cycle since 1928 when Solar Cycle 16 peaked at 78

When you look at the latest data points, the prediction seems too high, it should be adjusted.
Actually this has been done last month, see below. This new prediction gives an even lower maximum, below 70 !!

If this prediction comes true, we even have to go back to solar cycle 14, with a peak value of  64, in 1906. Click here for the list of solar cycles.
You can bet on it that solar scientists are following the development with great interest.
I will give you another update in a couple of months.

Don’t worry, our sun is not dead!

As you know, the sun is our life source..:-)
Already for more that 4.5 billion years she (or is it he?) is providing the energy for our solar system and she will continue to do so for another 5 billion years, before she will “die” and end as a so-called white dwarf
So why did the well-known Dutch solar astronomer Kees de Jager remark in an interview, November 2009, that the sun was dead?

Well, he was talking about the sunspot activity of the sun. Or rather, the lack of sunspot activity!

Here is an image of the sun, with a number of sunspots

Sunspots are a result of magnetic activity on the sun. The number of sunspots fluctuates in time with a period of roughly 11 years.
See the graph below. It is clear that it is a periodic phenomenon, but also that it is quite irregular.
The cycles are numbered from the time accurate observations became available, around 1750.
Cycle 23 started in 1996, reached its maximum around 2002, ending in 2007.
At about that time, 2007-2008 the new cycle 24 was expected to start.

But it did NOT!

During 2008 and 2009 the sun was surprisingly quiet, with long periods without any sunspots at all.
Therefore astronomers all over the world were watching the sun with more than usual interest.
A special website http://solarcycle24.com/ is monitoring daily the behaviour of the sun.

Here is a detailed graph, updated until February 2010. The red curve is the expected one.

As you see, 2008 and 2009 have been very quiet, with the average sunspot number almost approaching zero.
BUT, starting from December 2009 it looks like we have the beginning of cycle 24! Finally.
In a couple of days the results for March will be published. You can check for yourself:  http://solarcycle24.com/sunspots.htm

Is this topic only of academic interest?
No.
There may be a relation between the solar activity and the temperature of Earth.

Here is one more graph of the solar sunspot activity, this time over a time period of 400 years. In 1610 sunspots were observed for the first time with the newly invented telescope.
The red crosses represent these early observations. They are less accurate, but nevertheless it is obvious that in the second half of the 17th century there were hardly any sunspots at all.
This dip in solar activity is called the Maunder Minimum.

 

In the same period Europe and North America (and probably the rest of the world) were subjected to very cold winters, this period is called the Little Ice Age
There is an ongoing debate if there is a causal connection.
The last 50 years there has been a maximum in sunspot activity. Could it be that this increased activity has been another factor in the global warming, besides carbon emission?

Again Apophis

I got a few interesting questions about my first Apophis post

“Why not wait with a mission until after 2029, then it will be clearer if the Earth might be hit in 2036”
“Is it a coincidence that there are exactly seven years between the two data?”

Here is a bit more information. For some of you it may be a bit (too) technical ..:-) Don’t worry.

The present orbit of Apophis is shown in the figure below as the blue line, together with the orbits of Mercury, Venus and Earth, with the Sun in the center.
Distances are given in Astronomical Units (AU), where 1 AU = ~ 150 million km, the average distance between Earth and Sun.
Apophis has a period of  323.6 days, six weeks shorter than a year, and its orbit is quite elliptical, coming almost as close as the orbit of Venus, but also crossing the Earth orbit.

During an orbit Apophis crosses the Ecliptic twice. One crossing is no problem, but the other one is, because there it crosses the Earth orbit as well!
And Apophis, with its shorter period, is continuously overtaking Earth…..

The images come from an interesting NASA website where you can follow the course of Apophis in time.
Try it out and check that both Earth and Apophis will arrive at the Danger Point on 13-4-2029!

On that day Apophis will pass Earth at a distance of about 30.000 km and because of the Earth gravitation its orbit will be strongly disturbed.
It will get a boost from the encounter, increasing its orbit and its period. See the sketch below.

The uncertainty in the trajectory is indicated, the white bar is about 1000 km at present.

So, no need to worry about 2029. But there IS a (small) chance that Apophis might hit Earth exactly seven years later!
This could happen if Apophis, after deflection, enters into a resonant orbit with Earth.

What are resonant orbits? Two orbits are resonant if there is a simple relation between their respective periods, like 2:3, 5:6 etc
Example: two planets A and B with periods of 300 and 450 days have resonant orbits (2:3). Starting from any given position, they will be in exactly the same position after 900 days (A will have completed 3 orbits, while B has completed 2).

Back to Apophis.

There is a possibility that on 13-4-2029 Apophis will be deflected into a (6:7) resonant orbit! In that case it might hit Earth exactly 7 years later, having completed 6 orbits itself.

This will only happen when Apophis will pass through a very small “window” during its encounter with Earth in 2029. Estimated width about 600 meter(!) only. Astronomers call it a keyhole  🙂
Remember, Apophis has a size of ~ 300 m, so it just fits in the keyhole….

At this time the estimated probability that Apophis will pass through the 6:7 resonance keyhole is only about 1:250.000. Almost negligible .

Why is it then that for example the Russian Space Agency is still proposing a mission?
Well, if more accurate calculations in the coming years show that Apophis will pass through the keyhole, it will be rather easy to steer the asteroid away from it. As the keyhole is so small, just a few hundred meters will do.
That will be orders of magnitude easier than steering it away from the Earth, once it has passed the keyhole!

One last remark.
There was a question if a second hit, again on April 13, took into account leap years.
It does. A year is 365.25 days, so seven years equals 2556.75 days. And between 13-4-2029 and 13-4-2036 there are 2557 days (7 x 365 + 2 leap days).
Difference is only 6 hours. By the way 13-4-2036 will be a Sunday. Easter Sunday..:-)

Will the Earth be hit by Apophis in 2036?

A few days ago there was a news item about a proposal by the Russian Space Agency that they were considering a mission to this asteroid to deflect its course, because there is a risk that it might hit the earth in 2036.
Most asteroids orbit the Sun between Mars and Jupiter, but not all of them. Those with Earth-like orbits are monitored, because they might collide with the earth, with devastating consequences.

On 19-6-2004 an asteroid was discovered, which might collide with the earth in 2029. It was named Apophis, after the demon of darkness and chaos in Egyptian Mythology.
More accurate observations followed, and showed that this asteroid will NOT hit the Earth in 2029, although it will pass the Earth on Friday, April 13 (yes!) 2029 at a distance of only 30.000 km.
Mind you, that is closer than the altitude of the TV-satellites, circling the Earth!

At such a close distance the course of Apophis will be disturbed by the Earth. Calculations show that there is a small probability that at their next encounter, on Sunday, April 13 2036, Apophis could hit the earth. The estimated size of this asteroid is about 300 m and an impact could release an energy of ~ 900 megaton TNT (the Hiroshima atomic bomb was ~ 15 kiloton TNT, 60.000 times smaller!)

Here is the estimated risk path for such a collision

No wonder that it is the Russian Space Agency coming with this proposal.

When you want to know more about how to deflect such a massive piece of rock, there is a really fascinating educational website  about asteroids, Apophis, and how to deflect it. Choose the Expert option.